- About us»
- Net income calculator»
- Population aging»
-
-
- Unemployment structure in the Visegrad region
- Development in least developed regions
- Statistics of the least developed regions in Slovakia
- Detailed statistics of least developed regions in Slovakia
-
- Average wage
- Material need benefits
- Meal allowance
- Counties of Slovakia
- Inflation
- Living and Subsistence Minimum
- Unemployment of Czechia and Slovakia
- NACE Classification
-
- Life expectancy
- Gender differences
- Youth unemployment and NEET
- Minimum wage in EU
- Unemployment rates of different age groups
- Share of salaries on GDP
- Percentage of employees ususally working at nights
- Employment rate
- Long term unemployment
- NEET
- Unemployment rate
-
- Bratislava and surroundings
- Kopanice
- Danube river
- lower Vah river
- middle Vár river
- upper Nitra river
- lower Nitra river
- Mining cities
- Kysuce a Orava
- upper Vah river - Liptov
- Spiš cities
- upper Hron river
- Juhoslovenská kotlina
- Košice fold and Torysa river
- upper Zemplín
- lower Zemplín
- EU regions
- NUTS3 regions of Slovakia
- LAU1 dataset
-
-
- Projects and activities
- Inclusive growth»
- Good work
- Project SKRS
- Social system – reality and vision
- Library
-
- Education of unemployed
- Young unemployed not taking part in education
- Proposal to change the system of education funding
- News»
- Contact
Region upper Zemplín
consists of counties:
Towns
Region upper Zemplín contains cities Bardejov, Giraltovce, Hanušovce nad Topľou, Humenné, Medzilaborce, Snina, Stropkov, Svidník, Vranov nad Topľou and 375 villages. Statistics on city level on unemployment are for the period of 2026-01-01, for population are fore yar 2024.
name | number of inhabitants in economically active age | number of unemployed number of unemployed women number of long-term unemployed | unemployment rate unemployment rate of women long-term unemployment rate |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() Bardejov | 29 788 19 726 | 1 241 576 428 | 6.3 % 6 % 2.2 % |
![]() Humenné | 29 567 19 760 | 1 130 569 438 | 5.7 % 5.8 % 2.2 % |
![]() Vranov nad Topľou | 20 262 13 622 | 1 039 521 491 | 7.6 % 7.7 % 3.6 % |
![]() Snina | 17 879 12 299 | 772 463 346 | 6.3 % 7.5 % 2.8 % |
![]() Stropkov | 9 683 6 459 | 545 282 313 | 8.4 % 9 % 4.8 % |
![]() Svidník | 9 647 6 267 | 419 210 164 | 6.7 % 6.7 % 2.6 % |
![]() Medzilaborce | 5 723 3 785 | 412 198 217 | 10.9 % 10.8 % 5.7 % |
![]() Giraltovce | 3 958 2 696 | 248 146 128 | 9.2 % 11.2 % 4.7 % |
![]() Hanušovce nad Topľou | 3 728 2 438 | 294 168 166 | 12.1 % 13.6 % 6.8 % |
Villages with over 2000 inhabitants are Zborov (3670), Zámutov (3405), Belá nad Cirochou (3279), Vechec (3025), Raslavice (2802), Čaklov (2774), Bystré (2766), Soľ (2664), Sečovská Polianka (2619), Sačurov (2610), Stakčín (2351), Kamenica nad Cirochou (2305), Banské (2018).
| villages by number of inhabitants | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | up to 300 | 300 to 500 | 500 to 1000 | 1000 to 1500 | over 1500 | |
| 375 | 184 | 73 | 78 | 20 | 20 | |
Unemployment
| rok | 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| number of unemployed | 36 531 | 35 400 | 30 856 | 19 966 | 18 813 | 21 080 | 21 909 | 19 460 | 18 575 | 17 647 | 17 218 | 18 087 |
| number of long-term unemployed | 19 735 | 21 701 | 17 531 | 9622 | 8250 | 8928 | 11 056 | 10 167 | 9428 | 9135 | 8612 | 8690 |
| number of people receiving social benefits | 35 946 | 34 012 | 24 556 | 18 178 | 16 524 | 16 025 | 14 250 | 14 954 | 14 681 | 14 256 | 13 522 | 13 806 |
| number of activational workers | 7275 | 7561 | 5314 | 3276 | 2991 | 2756 | 2646 | 2741 | 869 | 1751 | 1886 | 917 |
| unemployment rate | 15.7 | 15.4 | 13.6 | 8.9 | 8.5 | 9.6 | 10.4 | 9.4 | 9 | 8.7 | 8.4 | 8.9 |
| long-term unemployment rate | 8.5 | 9.4 | 7.7 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| vacancies | 344 | 648 | 1826 | 2359 | 2867 | 2146 | 1900 | 1789 | 1162 | 1322 | 1172 | 989 |
Demographics
| 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| number of inhabitants | 326 202 | 325 396 | 323 637 | 322 187 | 321 215 | 320 211 | 311 168 | 309 929 | 309 002 | 308 168 | 308 168 | 308 168 |
| assignation tax | 73 990 675 | 75 592 119 | 90 359 753 | 107 879 884 | 121 616 154 | 124 795 150 | 119 600 239 | 132 492 079 | 146 027 086 | 146 443 546 | 118 279 335 | 127 713 181 |
| demographic dependency | 18.7 | 19.9 | 21.5 | 23.2 | 24.3 | 25.2 | 26.0 | 27.1 | 26.9 | 27.7 | ||
| number of employed foreigners | 107 | 769 | 880 | 648 | 770 | 826 | 823 | 982 | 1050 | 1254 | 1419 | 1572 |
Number of unemployed
| rok | 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| less than 24 years | 9256 | 6818 | 5364 | 3074 | 2986 | 3323 | 3339 | 2901 | 2693 | 2563 | 2524 | 2595 |
| 25 to 39 years | 16 191 | 13 236 | 11 487 | 7128 | 6650 | 7417 | 7561 | 6704 | 6308 | 6009 | 5817 | 6024 |
| 40 to 54 years | 13 742 | 11 543 | 10 223 | 6683 | 6200 | 6929 | 7235 | 6547 | 6356 | 6066 | 5980 | 6408 |
| 55 years and more | 3870 | 3803 | 3782 | 3080 | 2977 | 3411 | 3774 | 3308 | 3218 | 3008 | 2898 | 3095 |
Other regions
- Basic data on Slovak regions
- Labour market indicators of slovak regions.
- Region Bratislava and surroundings
- Region Kopanice
- Region Danube river
- Region lower Vah river
- Region middle Vár river
- Region upper Nitra river
- Region lower Nitra river
- Region Mining cities
- Region Kysuce a Orava
- Region upper Vah river – Liptov
- Region Spiš cities
- Region upper Hron river
- Region Juhoslovenská kotlina
- Region Košice fold and Torysa river
- Region upper Zemplín
- Region lower Zemplín
Suggested citation: Michal Páleník: Regions of Slovakia - Region upper Zemplín, IZ Bratislava, retrieved from: https://www.iz.sk/en/projects/regions-of-slovakia/upper-zemplin

Regions of the Slovak Republic
Due to the need of analysis we have created regions of Slovakia. We will bring more information about these regions from the macroeconomic point of view as well as from the point of view of the labour market.. . .









