Vývoj najmenej rozvinutých okresov
Stránka ukazuje historický vývoj jednotlivých okresov vo vzťahu k hranici definícii najmenej rozvinutého okresu (1,6 násobok priemeru SR disponibilnej resp. celkovej nezamestnanosti) v jednotlivých kvartáloch. Stĺpce hovoria o tom, o koľko evidovaných nezamestnaných by mal okres znížiť svoju nezamestnanosť, aby nebol najmenej rozvinutý. Číslo v zátvorke ukazuje koľko % je to z počtu nezamestnaných v danom okrese a kvartáli. Napr okres Rimavská Sobota by mal znížiť nezamestnanosť o polovicu, v roku 2013 to bolo "iba" o tretinu.
Súčasná metodika je 1,6 násobok evidovanej disponibilnej nezamestnanosti, navrhovaná metodika je návrh Inštitútu zamestnanosti a to 1,6 násobok evidovanej (celkovej) nezamestnanosti.
Michalovce
Okres Michalovce bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 7 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o -9%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 8 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 2%. A teda by nebol NRO, teraz nie je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | 854 (9%) | 253 (2%) |
| 2012 Q4 | 1303 (14%) | 674 (6%) |
| 2013 Q1 | 2300 (24%) | 1743 (15%) |
| 2013 Q2 | 1876 (19%) | 1616 (15%) |
| 2013 Q3 | 1929 (21%) | 1708 (16%) |
| 2013 Q4 | 1995 (22%) | 1859 (18%) |
| 2014 Q1 | 1721 (19%) | 1663 (16%) |
| 2014 Q2 | 1518 (17%) | 1318 (13%) |
| 2014 Q3 | 1372 (16%) | 1208 (12%) |
| 2014 Q4 | 1323 (15%) | 1371 (14%) |
| 2015 Q1 | 1294 (15%) | 1241 (12%) |
| 2015 Q2 | 1013 (12%) | 780 (8%) |
| 2015 Q3 | 1201 (15%) | 812 (8%) |
| 2015 Q4 | 1171 (16%) | 796 (9%) |
| 2016 Q1 | 791 (11%) | 454 (5%) |
| 2016 Q2 | 635 (9%) | 109 (1%) |
| 2016 Q3 | 448 (6%) | 69 (1%) |
| 2016 Q4 | 168 (2%) | -133 (-2%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -303 (-4%) | -678 (-8%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -531 (-8%) | -1092 (-14%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -594 (-10%) | -1138 (-16%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -869 (-15%) | -1197 (-17%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -868 (-15%) | -1136 (-16%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -938 (-17%) | -1293 (-19%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -922 (-17%) | -1285 (-19%) |
Lučenec
Okres Lučenec bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 16 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 11%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 16 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 15%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -678 (-9%) | -701 (-8%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -738 (-9%) | -646 (-7%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -258 (-3%) | -171 (-2%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -351 (-4%) | -277 (-3%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -38 (-0%) | -147 (-2%) |
| 2013 Q4 | 45 (1%) | -94 (-1%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -249 (-3%) | -126 (-1%) |
| 2014 Q2 | 24 (0%) | -160 (-2%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -84 (-1%) | -133 (-2%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -199 (-3%) | -75 (-1%) |
| 2015 Q1 | 14 (0%) | 70 (1%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -44 (-1%) | -86 (-1%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -41 (-1%) | -148 (-2%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -279 (-4%) | -256 (-4%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -258 (-4%) | -407 (-6%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -336 (-6%) | -527 (-8%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -337 (-6%) | -485 (-7%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -453 (-8%) | -566 (-9%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -473 (-9%) | -559 (-9%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -350 (-8%) | -501 (-9%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -194 (-5%) | -334 (-7%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -287 (-8%) | -449 (-10%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -222 (-6%) | -341 (-8%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -146 (-4%) | -339 (-8%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -67 (-2%) | -209 (-5%) |
Veľký Krtíš
Okres Veľký Krtíš bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 10 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 12%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 10 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 9%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -461 (-10%) | -494 (-10%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -528 (-11%) | -519 (-10%) |
| 2013 Q1 | 89 (2%) | 130 (2%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -58 (-1%) | -72 (-1%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -98 (-2%) | -152 (-3%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -297 (-6%) | -218 (-4%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -368 (-7%) | -391 (-7%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -380 (-8%) | -401 (-7%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -491 (-10%) | -436 (-8%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -569 (-12%) | -425 (-8%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -558 (-11%) | -404 (-8%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -316 (-7%) | -367 (-7%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -306 (-7%) | -242 (-5%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -410 (-10%) | -253 (-5%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -283 (-7%) | -194 (-4%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -191 (-5%) | -74 (-2%) |
| 2016 Q3 | 161 (5%) | 100 (3%) |
| 2016 Q4 | 85 (3%) | 61 (2%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -189 (-6%) | -123 (-4%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -171 (-6%) | -156 (-5%) |
| 2017 Q3 | 67 (3%) | 88 (4%) |
| 2017 Q4 | 50 (3%) | 93 (4%) |
| 2018 Q1 | 94 (5%) | 73 (3%) |
| 2018 Q2 | 140 (8%) | 128 (6%) |
| 2018 Q3 | 201 (12%) | 222 (11%) |
Gelnica
Okres Gelnica bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 14 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 16%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 45%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -47 (-2%) | -92 (-3%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -85 (-3%) | -124 (-3%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -42 (-1%) | -108 (-3%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -42 (-1%) | -80 (-2%) |
| 2013 Q3 | 143 (5%) | 25 (1%) |
| 2013 Q4 | 70 (2%) | -46 (-1%) |
| 2014 Q1 | 114 (4%) | -116 (-3%) |
| 2014 Q2 | 154 (6%) | -98 (-3%) |
| 2014 Q3 | 188 (7%) | -95 (-3%) |
| 2014 Q4 | 208 (8%) | -88 (-3%) |
| 2015 Q1 | 87 (3%) | -207 (-6%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -37 (-1%) | -315 (-10%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -79 (-3%) | -348 (-11%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -79 (-3%) | -501 (-15%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -84 (-4%) | -511 (-16%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -108 (-5%) | -489 (-16%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -14 (-1%) | -356 (-13%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -127 (-6%) | -336 (-13%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -233 (-11%) | -421 (-17%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -303 (-16%) | -449 (-19%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -341 (-19%) | -479 (-22%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -394 (-23%) | -504 (-24%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -371 (-22%) | -476 (-23%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -331 (-21%) | -388 (-21%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -225 (-16%) | -291 (-17%) |
Košice - okolie
Okres Košice - okolie bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 12 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 19%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 11 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 10%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -624 (-5%) | -343 (-3%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -755 (-6%) | -422 (-3%) |
| 2013 Q1 | 1172 (9%) | 1615 (12%) |
| 2013 Q2 | 1133 (9%) | 1455 (11%) |
| 2013 Q3 | 1233 (11%) | 1538 (12%) |
| 2013 Q4 | 1135 (10%) | 1390 (11%) |
| 2014 Q1 | 853 (8%) | 1086 (9%) |
| 2014 Q2 | 274 (2%) | 605 (5%) |
| 2014 Q3 | 359 (3%) | 614 (5%) |
| 2014 Q4 | 277 (3%) | 632 (5%) |
| 2015 Q1 | 340 (3%) | 698 (6%) |
| 2015 Q2 | 209 (2%) | 496 (4%) |
| 2015 Q3 | 60 (1%) | 350 (3%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -363 (-4%) | 55 (0%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -521 (-5%) | -39 (-0%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -576 (-6%) | -111 (-1%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -552 (-6%) | -203 (-2%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -798 (-9%) | -501 (-5%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -1306 (-15%) | -1056 (-11%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -1570 (-20%) | -1312 (-15%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -1300 (-18%) | -1097 (-14%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -1404 (-21%) | -1244 (-16%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -1290 (-19%) | -1072 (-14%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -1208 (-19%) | -970 (-14%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -980 (-16%) | -756 (-11%) |
Bardejov
Okres Bardejov bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 13 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 20%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 11 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 5%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | 499 (7%) | 929 (12%) |
| 2012 Q4 | 390 (5%) | 779 (9%) |
| 2013 Q1 | 548 (6%) | 796 (9%) |
| 2013 Q2 | 915 (12%) | 1149 (14%) |
| 2013 Q3 | 1040 (14%) | 1049 (13%) |
| 2013 Q4 | 624 (8%) | 674 (8%) |
| 2014 Q1 | 140 (2%) | 600 (7%) |
| 2014 Q2 | 321 (4%) | 840 (10%) |
| 2014 Q3 | 487 (7%) | 892 (11%) |
| 2014 Q4 | 227 (3%) | 626 (8%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -104 (-1%) | 439 (5%) |
| 2015 Q2 | 170 (2%) | 554 (7%) |
| 2015 Q3 | 328 (5%) | 660 (9%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -324 (-5%) | 158 (2%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -545 (-8%) | -28 (-0%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -446 (-7%) | -82 (-1%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -489 (-8%) | -141 (-2%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -948 (-15%) | -567 (-8%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -1217 (-19%) | -809 (-12%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -1405 (-23%) | -1029 (-16%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -859 (-17%) | -664 (-12%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -846 (-18%) | -612 (-12%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -907 (-20%) | -653 (-13%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -680 (-16%) | -502 (-11%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -562 (-14%) | -423 (-9%) |
Medzilaborce
Okres Medzilaborce bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 13 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 26%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 57%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | 62 (5%) | -3 (-0%) |
| 2012 Q4 | 73 (6%) | 2 (0%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -50 (-4%) | -128 (-8%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -49 (-4%) | -135 (-9%) |
| 2013 Q3 | 76 (7%) | -71 (-5%) |
| 2013 Q4 | 114 (11%) | -74 (-5%) |
| 2014 Q1 | 25 (2%) | -52 (-4%) |
| 2014 Q2 | 86 (8%) | -72 (-5%) |
| 2014 Q3 | 77 (7%) | -97 (-7%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -9 (-1%) | -114 (-8%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -7 (-1%) | -103 (-8%) |
| 2015 Q2 | 51 (5%) | -58 (-5%) |
| 2015 Q3 | 59 (6%) | -59 (-5%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -38 (-4%) | -150 (-12%) |
| 2016 Q1 | 9 (1%) | -142 (-12%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -81 (-9%) | -188 (-16%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -192 (-19%) | -263 (-21%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -202 (-20%) | -261 (-22%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -183 (-19%) | -283 (-24%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -211 (-24%) | -309 (-28%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -194 (-25%) | -259 (-27%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -180 (-25%) | -234 (-26%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -148 (-22%) | -254 (-28%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -107 (-18%) | -229 (-28%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -136 (-22%) | -231 (-28%) |
Sobrance
Okres Sobrance bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 33%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 51%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -280 (-12%) | -396 (-15%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -282 (-12%) | -433 (-16%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -31 (-1%) | -134 (-5%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -4 (-0%) | -87 (-3%) |
| 2013 Q3 | 25 (1%) | -89 (-3%) |
| 2013 Q4 | 24 (1%) | -77 (-3%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -45 (-2%) | -133 (-5%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -10 (-0%) | -172 (-7%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -65 (-3%) | -181 (-7%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -125 (-6%) | -192 (-8%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -199 (-9%) | -246 (-10%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -128 (-6%) | -201 (-8%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -81 (-4%) | -198 (-8%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -105 (-6%) | -234 (-10%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -168 (-9%) | -298 (-13%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -69 (-4%) | -241 (-12%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -84 (-5%) | -249 (-12%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -254 (-15%) | -365 (-18%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -342 (-20%) | -461 (-23%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -359 (-23%) | -493 (-26%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -284 (-21%) | -422 (-25%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -322 (-25%) | -422 (-27%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -327 (-25%) | -372 (-24%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -246 (-21%) | -346 (-24%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -230 (-20%) | -349 (-24%) |
Svidník
Okres Svidník bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 40%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 42%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -32 (-1%) | -16 (-0%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -26 (-1%) | 26 (1%) |
| 2013 Q1 | 31 (1%) | 47 (1%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -13 (-0%) | 11 (0%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -5 (-0%) | -64 (-2%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -21 (-1%) | -41 (-1%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -171 (-4%) | -19 (-0%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -261 (-7%) | -95 (-2%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -150 (-4%) | -113 (-3%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -17 (-0%) | -104 (-3%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -112 (-3%) | -101 (-3%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -41 (-1%) | -2 (-0%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -27 (-1%) | -64 (-2%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -205 (-6%) | -265 (-7%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -341 (-11%) | -466 (-12%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -406 (-13%) | -558 (-15%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -529 (-17%) | -589 (-16%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -701 (-22%) | -691 (-20%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -813 (-26%) | -789 (-22%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -819 (-28%) | -818 (-25%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -483 (-21%) | -565 (-21%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -501 (-23%) | -516 (-20%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -620 (-28%) | -568 (-22%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -587 (-28%) | -574 (-24%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -566 (-27%) | -585 (-24%) |
Trebišov
Okres Trebišov bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 41%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 63%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -1998 (-17%) | -2418 (-18%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -1814 (-15%) | -2115 (-15%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -418 (-3%) | -573 (-4%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -580 (-5%) | -699 (-5%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -501 (-4%) | -803 (-6%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -374 (-3%) | -637 (-5%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -535 (-5%) | -993 (-8%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -511 (-5%) | -1102 (-9%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -473 (-4%) | -1150 (-9%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -262 (-3%) | -1075 (-9%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -363 (-4%) | -1189 (-10%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -606 (-6%) | -1412 (-12%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -785 (-8%) | -1475 (-12%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -724 (-8%) | -1389 (-12%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -662 (-8%) | -1638 (-15%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -718 (-9%) | -1785 (-17%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -963 (-11%) | -1919 (-18%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -1335 (-16%) | -2058 (-20%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -1799 (-22%) | -2494 (-25%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -1874 (-25%) | -2563 (-28%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -1762 (-26%) | -2305 (-28%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -1858 (-29%) | -2291 (-29%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -1958 (-30%) | -2251 (-28%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -1985 (-31%) | -2213 (-29%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -2000 (-31%) | -2241 (-30%) |
Sabinov
Okres Sabinov bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 45%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 49%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -1225 (-19%) | -1016 (-15%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -1270 (-19%) | -1082 (-15%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -587 (-9%) | -389 (-5%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -632 (-9%) | -432 (-6%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -504 (-8%) | -617 (-9%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -554 (-9%) | -667 (-10%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -668 (-10%) | -545 (-8%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -622 (-10%) | -516 (-8%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -552 (-9%) | -446 (-7%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -553 (-9%) | -425 (-7%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -708 (-12%) | -457 (-7%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -505 (-9%) | -382 (-6%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -604 (-11%) | -411 (-7%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -355 (-7%) | -551 (-9%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -503 (-10%) | -728 (-12%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -610 (-13%) | -844 (-15%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -847 (-17%) | -973 (-17%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -842 (-18%) | -1028 (-19%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -874 (-19%) | -1045 (-20%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -956 (-23%) | -1106 (-23%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -864 (-23%) | -993 (-23%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -726 (-22%) | -916 (-23%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -821 (-25%) | -988 (-24%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -950 (-29%) | -1081 (-27%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -903 (-28%) | -999 (-26%) |
Vranov nad Topľou
Okres Vranov nad Topľou bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 49%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 67%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -457 (-5%) | -965 (-10%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -494 (-6%) | -1264 (-12%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -418 (-4%) | -972 (-9%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -385 (-4%) | -789 (-8%) |
| 2013 Q3 | 11 (0%) | -646 (-7%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -656 (-7%) | -789 (-8%) |
| 2014 Q1 | 131 (2%) | -744 (-8%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -343 (-4%) | -894 (-9%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -552 (-7%) | -905 (-9%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -536 (-7%) | -1018 (-11%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -774 (-9%) | -1115 (-11%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -691 (-9%) | -1035 (-11%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -667 (-9%) | -1092 (-12%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -224 (-3%) | -1082 (-12%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -774 (-11%) | -1413 (-16%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -1101 (-16%) | -1682 (-20%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -1206 (-17%) | -1621 (-19%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -1309 (-19%) | -1838 (-22%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -1581 (-23%) | -2084 (-26%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -1641 (-26%) | -2026 (-27%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -1420 (-26%) | -1657 (-26%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -1546 (-29%) | -1672 (-27%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -1781 (-33%) | -1937 (-31%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -1675 (-33%) | -1814 (-31%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -1662 (-33%) | -1877 (-32%) |
Poltár
Okres Poltár bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 60%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 71%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -378 (-13%) | -425 (-13%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -454 (-15%) | -450 (-14%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -544 (-17%) | -530 (-15%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -570 (-18%) | -563 (-17%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -432 (-15%) | -543 (-17%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -415 (-15%) | -530 (-17%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -636 (-21%) | -628 (-20%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -457 (-17%) | -549 (-18%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -417 (-16%) | -477 (-16%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -432 (-17%) | -438 (-15%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -446 (-18%) | -474 (-17%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -428 (-18%) | -437 (-16%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -351 (-15%) | -435 (-16%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -440 (-19%) | -507 (-19%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -448 (-21%) | -585 (-22%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -449 (-22%) | -566 (-23%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -411 (-21%) | -466 (-20%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -370 (-20%) | -478 (-22%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -447 (-24%) | -554 (-25%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -392 (-24%) | -485 (-25%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -300 (-22%) | -361 (-22%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -327 (-25%) | -389 (-24%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -281 (-22%) | -329 (-21%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -225 (-20%) | -313 (-22%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -200 (-18%) | -264 (-19%) |
Rožňava
Okres Rožňava bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 92%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 108%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -2004 (-23%) | -1875 (-20%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -1801 (-20%) | -1670 (-18%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -1840 (-20%) | -1689 (-18%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -1504 (-18%) | -1720 (-18%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -868 (-11%) | -1665 (-18%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -974 (-13%) | -1714 (-19%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -1264 (-16%) | -1818 (-20%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -1446 (-19%) | -1930 (-22%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -1247 (-17%) | -1849 (-21%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -1308 (-18%) | -1827 (-21%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -1310 (-18%) | -1823 (-21%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -1352 (-19%) | -1651 (-20%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -1267 (-19%) | -1588 (-20%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -1443 (-21%) | -1825 (-23%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -1478 (-23%) | -1964 (-25%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -1453 (-24%) | -1790 (-25%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -1744 (-28%) | -1949 (-27%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -2043 (-32%) | -2207 (-31%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -2221 (-36%) | -2471 (-35%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -1981 (-37%) | -2139 (-35%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -1707 (-36%) | -1798 (-33%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -1890 (-40%) | -1982 (-37%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -1857 (-40%) | -1995 (-37%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -1767 (-40%) | -1965 (-38%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -1609 (-38%) | -1767 (-36%) |
Kežmarok
Okres Kežmarok bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 104%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 108%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -2135 (-25%) | -2070 (-22%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -2273 (-25%) | -2189 (-22%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -1771 (-19%) | -1633 (-16%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -1826 (-20%) | -1780 (-18%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -1742 (-20%) | -1896 (-20%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -1965 (-22%) | -2133 (-22%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -1898 (-21%) | -1918 (-20%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -1983 (-23%) | -2012 (-21%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -1700 (-20%) | -1882 (-20%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -1886 (-22%) | -2027 (-22%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -1744 (-21%) | -1866 (-20%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -1932 (-24%) | -1983 (-22%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -1818 (-23%) | -1875 (-21%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -2218 (-28%) | -2190 (-25%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -2031 (-27%) | -2078 (-25%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -2110 (-29%) | -2270 (-28%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -1987 (-28%) | -2054 (-26%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -2224 (-32%) | -2322 (-30%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -2214 (-33%) | -2265 (-30%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -2419 (-38%) | -2433 (-35%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -2085 (-38%) | -2121 (-34%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -2159 (-40%) | -2196 (-36%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -2000 (-40%) | -2084 (-36%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -2061 (-42%) | -2115 (-38%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -1928 (-41%) | -2011 (-37%) |
Revúca
Okres Revúca bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 109%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 183%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -1907 (-30%) | -2074 (-30%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -1940 (-29%) | -2051 (-29%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -2065 (-31%) | -2192 (-30%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -1945 (-30%) | -2184 (-31%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -1680 (-28%) | -2191 (-31%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -1575 (-27%) | -2091 (-31%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -1778 (-30%) | -2192 (-32%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -1440 (-27%) | -2213 (-33%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -1546 (-29%) | -2146 (-33%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -1475 (-28%) | -2140 (-33%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -1352 (-27%) | -2319 (-35%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -1228 (-26%) | -2290 (-36%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -1269 (-27%) | -2188 (-36%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -751 (-19%) | -2209 (-37%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -874 (-22%) | -2315 (-39%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -1235 (-30%) | -2289 (-40%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -1350 (-32%) | -2243 (-41%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -1473 (-35%) | -2002 (-39%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -1674 (-40%) | -2046 (-41%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -1459 (-40%) | -1756 (-41%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -929 (-32%) | -1557 (-40%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -915 (-34%) | -1571 (-42%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -1134 (-40%) | -1775 (-46%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -968 (-38%) | -1808 (-48%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -992 (-38%) | -1763 (-48%) |
Rimavská Sobota
Okres Rimavská Sobota bol podľa starej metodiky nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov, spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 172%. Podľa IZ metodiky bol nad priemerom 17 štvrťrokov a spolu prekročil kritickú hodnotu o 198%. A teda by bol NRO, teraz je NRO.
| kvartál | stará metodika | navrhovaná metodika |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Q3 | -4901 (-37%) | -4970 (-35%) |
| 2012 Q4 | -4961 (-36%) | -4992 (-34%) |
| 2013 Q1 | -4511 (-32%) | -4441 (-29%) |
| 2013 Q2 | -4571 (-33%) | -4524 (-31%) |
| 2013 Q3 | -4049 (-31%) | -4583 (-32%) |
| 2013 Q4 | -4052 (-31%) | -4646 (-32%) |
| 2014 Q1 | -4316 (-33%) | -4802 (-33%) |
| 2014 Q2 | -4478 (-35%) | -4848 (-34%) |
| 2014 Q3 | -4073 (-33%) | -4874 (-35%) |
| 2014 Q4 | -4126 (-34%) | -5013 (-36%) |
| 2015 Q1 | -4096 (-34%) | -4999 (-36%) |
| 2015 Q2 | -3990 (-35%) | -4870 (-36%) |
| 2015 Q3 | -3945 (-35%) | -4716 (-36%) |
| 2015 Q4 | -4189 (-37%) | -4787 (-37%) |
| 2016 Q1 | -4423 (-40%) | -4939 (-39%) |
| 2016 Q2 | -4342 (-41%) | -4862 (-40%) |
| 2016 Q3 | -4137 (-40%) | -4718 (-40%) |
| 2016 Q4 | -4310 (-43%) | -4849 (-42%) |
| 2017 Q1 | -4522 (-46%) | -4981 (-45%) |
| 2017 Q2 | -4486 (-49%) | -4829 (-47%) |
| 2017 Q3 | -4042 (-49%) | -4427 (-47%) |
| 2017 Q4 | -3787 (-50%) | -4347 (-49%) |
| 2018 Q1 | -3691 (-50%) | -4377 (-49%) |
| 2018 Q2 | -3690 (-51%) | -4292 (-50%) |
| 2018 Q3 | -3418 (-50%) | -3964 (-49%) |
Priebežne aktualizované
Na stránke ponúkame priebežne dopĺňané a aktualizované údaje, napríklad o miere nezamestnanosti.. . .
Najmenej rozvinuté okresy
Najmenej rozvinuté okresy sú okresy Lučenec, Poltár, Revúca, Rimavská Sobota, Veľký Krtíš, Kežmarok, Sabinov, Svidník, Vranov nad Topľou, Rožňava, Sobrance a Trebišov.. . .
Podobné správy
Výška stravného, Štatistiky poberateľov dávok, Číselník okresov Slovenska, Zákon o podpore najmenej rozvinutých okresov, Priemerná mzda a inflácia, Životné minimum, MInimálna mzda, Nezamestnanosť Česka a Slovenska, Panelová diskusia: Životné podmienky ľudí z marginalizovaných rómskych komunít, Priebežne aktualizované
Mzdová kalkulačka
Aktuálne štatistikyRýchla navigácia
Aktuálne štatistiky
November 2018: počet UoZ na úradoch práce: 171871, z toho 67003 dlhodobo, miera 6.3% (2.4% dlhodobá nezamestnosť)
Najvyššia nezamestnanosť: Rimavská Sobota 19.7% (11.7%), Revúca 18.9% (9.8%), Kežmarok 17.4% (8.2%), Rožňava 15.8% (8.7%), Vranov nad Topľou 15.2% (7.2%)
Najnižšia nezam.: Trenčín 2.3%, Bratislava V 2.4%, Galanta 2.4%, Hlohovec 2.6%, Skalica 2.6%
Facebook
Twitter
RSS